About Me

Name: Terry Hestilow
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Communism by definition.

   The American Heritage dictionary (fourth edition), copyright 2001 by Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts, defines communism, "n. 1. an economic system characterized by collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for common advantage. 2. Communism a. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power. b. The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine."   
   According to an American history text used in the Fort Worth, Texas, Independent School District, circa 1972, [Frank Freidel and Henry N. Drewry, America: a Modern History of the United States, (Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co., 1970), 398], "From Europe came another alternative for American workers.  The writings of Karl Marx became the doctrine of many laborers who had organized strong unions as way stations on the route to the destruction of capitalism and the establishment of socialism."
   Let's see.  Do you remember candidate Barack Obama in socialist Berlin, verbally attacking our government and calling for radical "change"?  Isn't it interesting that three weeks into the presidency of Barack Obama he and his Democrat Party are passing legislation that seeks to control the economy [through the defacto nationalization of private industrial resources] by the federal government [spell that "State"] through authoritarian ["I won"] single party rule?  Is it not true that the final result of President Obama's, and his Democrat allies, will be "an economic system characterized by collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for common advantage"?
   I realized today, thanks to a caller on the Rush Limbaugh, EIB, radio program, that one of the huge reasons that the United States of America is standing on the precipice of a leap into a socialism that is increasingly smelling like Marxist-Leninist Communism, is that the dumbing down process has been so effective among the US population, that more than half of voting age citizens understand economics at the kindergarten level!  The caller rightly pointed out that we had better start educating our children on what socialism seeks to do to them as it relieves them of their property and their rights.
   Always razor sharp, Rush responded [and I am paraphrasing here], that every parent needs to set their children down, gather all of their toys, and instruct them that they must give up half of their toys to others.  He went on to say that when the children cry and protest that the toys belong to them, the parents need to correct the children by telling them that they own nothing; that the government really owns everything and will give them only the toys that they need!
   I would make one exception.  Instead of making the parents the bad guys, I would say that someone representing an Obama government agency, led by a Party member who is personally exempt from abiding by the same rules that they push onto the citizens, should take away the children's toys.  Only then will the next generation of Americans begin to understand personally what the new Communism will finally mean to them; because today, they don't have a clue.
   Before it is too late [and we may already be there] citizens should weigh carefully the benefits of a capitalist system [the economic system that the United States achieved her greatness under].  That same dictionary, cited above, defines capitalism, "n. An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market."
   In short, you own and market your own labor and creativity!  The government does not own you or your productive capacity!  That means that you can invest in the goods and services you want; not the government taking your money to buy what you don't want or need.  Finally, it means that the economic engine of this great nation is powered by those who own their own resources investing in what is sound; not the government trying to legislate production and jobs.
   Get on the phone, write letters, and send emails to your representatives in both the House and Senate, Democrat and Republican alike, and tell them to get us back to capitalism!  Make them, the main stream media, and Hollywood celebrities understand that the people of the United States of America are NOT going to surrender this great nation.  Then vote for conservatives, regardless of party (you hear that Senator McCain?)!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Racism Raises Ugly Head in New Administration

41 "Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?  42 How can you say to your brother, 'Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,' when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye?  You hipocrite, first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."
Luke 6:41, 42 (NIV)
 
   Throughout the recent campaign for the presidency of the United States of America there was a clear and constant theme; "racism."  It was not the racism of the founding history in the United States, where black citizens were systematically and institutionally deprived of equal rights under law; but rather, it was a racism that demanded a common burden of guilt among white citizens for each and every offense ever committed against black members of the community.  In this constant class indictment, where every caucasian was born convicted of the sins of their ancestors, the only acceptable penance was an open and unbridled confession of guilt and full throated vocal support of the Democrat nominee as the first "black president."
   To accomplish this task required a blindness in his disciples of his far reaching liberal record and Socialist agenda; and a willing ignorance of each and every violation of election ethics and law.  According to the mainstream media, no obstacle to the election of Barack Hussein Obama could be endured if the United States was ever to correct the error of its past and finally be free of racial prejudice.
   Of course, the true racists (and there are many) could not be openly identified.  Senator John McCain would have had the flesh beaten from the backs of any supporters who dared to rightly point out the blatant "race baters" of the Democrat Party (it was nice to see that President Bill Clinton, the official "first black president" could recognize the racism used against his wife).  But, the truth be known, the ones most guilty of the crime of racism against the modern black community has been those enablers who enslave blacks with welfare, drive wedges between husbands and wives as they use every available tool to destroy the family, and promote the lie that white Americans are responsible for black violence, drug addiction, disease, and children that would rather join gangs than learn their lessons in school where they could really get ahead in life.  And all the people said, "Amen!"
   Yes, there is a racism of the past, and there is a racism of the present; but the current racism is almost never a function of those on the political "Right."  Beyond the likes of Senator Robert Byrd, Democrat, West Virginia, and others like him who are happy to claim the black vote if it will keep them in political power, there is also the likes of religious power brokers who, rather than teach their congregants the values of Christ, are much more happy to blame others for the condition of their community.  In this case, they maintain their power over their subjects, become rich off their ignorance, and are always able to point the finger of blame to others "who don't look like them" [do the phrases "Black Liberation Theology" ("...God d__n America!"--Rev. Jeremiah Wright) and "Nation of Islam" (Louis Farrakhan) ring any bells?).
   Giving the "benediction" at the conclusion of the inauguration of President Barack Hussein Obama, the Rev. Joseph E. Lowery, founding member of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, closed his prayer with the following phrase.  He said, "...help us work for that day when black will not be asked to give back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man, and when white will do what's right."  President Obama offered no rebuke, no objection, and no apology for this guest pastor's blatant racial assault against every white citizen of the United States of America.  Obviously, he approved!
   The lesson from Jesus in the book of Luke is one we all need to keep in mind.  If we are really serious about overcoming racism we need first to recognize the prejudice in our own hearts.  It seems to me that there is plenty for men and women of every race to do to "get right"; not just the "whites" of Rev. Lowery's prayer.
   In truth, though, we can see that there is no penance that will ever be acceptable for this group of Americans who have sworn their souls to the Democrat Party.  The reason is simple; they will never give up a tool that works so well to enslave white voters to achieve their Socialist agenda under the cover of overcoming racism.
   The Democrat Party, the party of President Barack Hussein Obama, has set the tone for the foreseeable future; and it is clearly going to be a racism that continues to blame white America for every problem of the black community.
   You thought racism had finally been defeated in the United States of America?  Not as long as Democrats have a breath in their body to accuse your children of the slavery and oppression of the past.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The United States Constitution: It is not about "technicalities"! Legislators called to enforce Constitution.

In my inaugural blog, I responded to editorial writer David Horowitz who was complaining about conservatives who insist that President-elect Barack Obama produce a valid official birth certificate documenting that he was, indeed, born in the United States of America (Hawaii) and is constitutionally authorized to hold the office for which he campaigned and was subsequently elected November 4, 2008.  Horowitz complained these individuals were “…Birth Certificate zealots…arguing that 64 million voters should be disenfranchised because of a contested technicality as to whether Obama was born on U.S. soil(emphasis mine) rather than Kenya (his fathers home).  You may have already read my blog.  If not, you should find it included in the “Combatsoldier” blog dated 13 December.

The final portion of my blog article included the letter that I had sent to my own congressional representative, Kay Granger, of the 12th Congressional District of Texas.  I also noted that similar letters were mailed to Senators John Cornyn, (R) Texas, and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, (R) Texas.

Because I invited you to similarly call upon your own U.S. Representatives and Senators to honor their oath of office and insist that the United States Constitution be upheld in the matter of this “technicality” concerning the constitutional requirements to fill the office of the president, I thought that you deserved to know how my own congressional representatives responded to my letters, and my subsequent response to them.  Their responses to me are contained below.  A copy of my response to each of them follows at the end.

 

Email response from Congresswoman Kay Granger to me:

 

Dear Terry:

            Thank you for contacting me with your thoughts about the 2008 election.  I appreciated hearing from you.

Now that the election is over and the campaigns have ended, I think it is important that the politicians and the citizens of our nation put the fierce partisan rhetoric aside so that we can work together to come up with real solutions to our country’s challenges.

We in the Congress have a long list of important issues that we must deal with in the coming year.  The unemployment rate is rising, too many Americans don’t have health care, our military is fighting two wars abroad, the federal deficit is growing exponentially, and we rely too heavily on foreign countries for our energy supply.  You can be sure that I will always fight for the residents of the 12th District as legislation makes its way through the House of Representatives.

The people of our nation have a strong tradition of banding together to overcome whatever hurdles we may find in our path, and I believe that we will rise to the challenge once again.

Thank you again for contacting me.  I hope you will continue to keep me informed on the issues that are important to you.  For more information on my work in Congress or to sign up for weekly updates, please visit the 12th District’s website, http://kaygranger.house.gov.

 

Sincerely,

[with typed name of Kay Granger, Member of Congress].

 

Email response of Senator John Cornyn to me:

 

Dear Mr. Hestilow:

Thank you for contacting me regarding President-elect Barack Obama. I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this matter.

As you know, on January 20, 2009, Barack Obama will be sworn in as the forty-fourth President of the United States of America. As we enter the 111th Congress, our nation faces many challenges. We are in the midst of tough economic times, and the federal government must stand on the side of taxpayers and small businesses. Now more than ever, we need fiscal discipline in Washington. I welcome President-elect Obama’s commitment to reform the federal budget process and rein in wasteful government spending, and I will hold the President-elect accountable as Congress works to quickly identify and eliminate inefficient, ineffective, and outdated federal programs.

Families across Texas and the nation are forced to make tough financial decisions each day—the federal government should be no different. But year after year too many government programs are funded because there are small—but vocal—special interest groups backing them with little Congressional oversight to determine when ideas have run their course. The American people have a right to know how their hard earned dollars are being spent, and I will continue to support making our government more transparent, accountable, and efficient.

While strengthening the economy must remain a priority, we must also find bipartisan solutions to address other critical issues facing our nation while continuing to advance conservative principles such as limited government, lower taxes, family values, and fighting against those who seek to destroy the American way of life. The consequences of continued inaction are too great. It is imperative that Congress act quickly to secure our borders, reform our country’s immigration laws, modernize healthcare, and promote energy independence. You may be certain that I will continue to pursue conservative initiatives that reinforce the principles upon which our country was founded while holding the new Administration accountable to the American people.

I appreciate having the opportunity to represent the interests of Texans in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me.

Sincerely,

JOHN CORNYN
United States Senator

[Virtual copy from email to Microsoft Word]

 

   Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, who is seeking election as Governor of the State of Texas in the next gubernatorial election has not responded to my letter in any way.

 

My response to Congresswoman Granger, Senator Cornyn, and Senator Hutchison follows:

 

Dear Congresswoman Granger, Senator Cornyn, and Senator Hutchison:

 

On December 3, 2008, I wrote to each of you concerning matters of national security and constitutional consequence regarding the refusal of President-elect Barack Obama to produce a valid birth certificate verifying that he meets each of the minimal requirements under the U.S. Constitution for him to serve in that office.  My request was not partisan in nature; it was not mean in spirit; and it did not ask any one of you, nor anyone else, to do anything not already required by the United States Constitution.  My request to each of you was that you honor the oath of office that you took when you were sworn to duty in the United States House of Representatives and United States Senate respectively.

Only two of you had the courtesy to respond to my letter.  I expect that the rigors of getting ready to run for office as Governor of the State of Texas kept Senator Hutchison from writing.

What is most significant of any of your responses (or non-responses) is that none of you made any mention of the issue about which I had communicated to you in the first place.  Of course, I know that none of you actually read or respond to letters sent to your office; but rather, have aides who tend to such matters.  However, I must conclude that your aides communicate to your constituents what you, yourself, think and how you intend to deal with the subject of the letter!  Apparently, none of you have aides that can respond “on subject”!

Congresswoman Granger, after thanking me for writing to you, you began to piously chide, “Now that the election is over and the campaigns have ended, I think it is important that the politicians and the citizens of our nation put the fierce partisan rhetoric aside so that we can work together to come up with real solutions to our country’s challenges.”

You went on to inform me, a retired Army Vietnam veteran who returned from duty in Afghanistan in April of 2008 (82nd Airborne), “We in the Congress have a long list of important issues that we must deal with in the coming year.  The unemployment rate is rising, too many Americans don’t have health care, our military is fighting two wars abroad, the federal deficit is growing exponentially, and we rely too heavily on foreign countries for our energy supply.  You can be sure that I will always fight for the residents of the 12th District as legislation makes its way through the House of Representatives.”

While I am well aware of the importance of each of these issues, and feel their impact personally and deeply, and also, since I have presented my own body as a target for the enemy in Afghanistan in the defense of this nation, I must protest that none of that is what I wrote to you about!  I didn’t write out of “fierce partisan rhetoric”!  I wrote about public officials and their responsibility to ensure that even the most powerful, especially the most powerful, in our nation, those called to enforce the U.S. Constitution, would ensure that the person elected to be the leader of this nation, Barack Obama, would do the simple act of providing proof that he is qualified for office by producing his official birth certificate!  None of you were willing to do that!  None of you showed the strength of character, the courage, to stand for the rule of law and demand that the United States Constitution be enforced!

It probably does not matter to any of you that I have lost respect for you.  It does not matter to me who runs against you in the future, no one can be a poorer candidate for office than one who has sworn to uphold the Constitution, and then, in the heat of politics, to abandon your commitment to our founding document, the rule of law, and integrity with those who have paid with the last full measure to defend this nation and our way of life.  It probably does not matter, but it should.  I probably represent more of your core constituencies than you would like to believe!

No, I have always honored my commitment to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.  I will never support a political office holder who has demonstrated a lack of integrity with that principle.  You have received my last vote.  Unless you find the courage to stand for the Constitution and demand that Barack Obama produce his official birth certificate, proving he is qualified to serve as president, I shall never support any of you again.

And, oh by the way, Representative Granger, to your guarantee that you “will always fight for the residents of the 12th District as legislation makes its way through the House of Representatives”; and Senator Cornyn, when you assure that you “will continue to pursue conservative initiatives that reinforce the principles upon which our country was founded while holding the new Administration accountable to the American people”; I say that I will believe it when I see that you are willing to fight for the uncomfortable “technicalities” of the United States Constitution.  As of today none of you have shown that kind of courage and character.

 

Sincerely,

 

Terry M. Hestilow

Fort Worth, Texas

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »